1. The problem statement all variables and given/known datad/dx 1/sin(y/2)3. The attempt at a solutionthis isn't an entire question just looking for clarification about something i have been asked as part of a larger question to find the partial derivative of 1/sin(y) with respect to x in this case you treat y as a constant yes?so d/dx of (sin(y/2) = cos(y/2)*dy/dx since y is treated as a constant dy/dx = 0 so d/dx of sin(y/2) = 0 if you use the quotient rule on the beat equation you change integrity by 0^2 which is 0 so you end up dividing by 0. Is this change by reversal?The beat expression actually has sin(x/2 + y/2)above instead of 1 is it just a matter of rearranging this expression so that the furnish cancels out? or does d/dx sin(y/2) not actually evaluate to 0 in the first displace?thanks in go!
1. The problem statement all variables and given/known datad/dx 1/sin(y/2)3. The act at a solutionthis isn't an entire question just looking for clarification about something i have been asked as move of a larger challenge to find the partial derivative of 1/sin(y) with respect to x in this inspect you treat y as a constant yes?so d/dx of (sin(y/2) = cos(y/2)*dy/dx since y is treated as a constant dy/dx = 0 so d/dx of sin(y/2) = 0 if you use the quotient command on the full equation you divide by 0^2 which is 0 so you end up dividing by 0. Is this correct?The full expression actually has sin(x/2 + y/2)above instead of 1 is it just a matter of rearranging this expression so that the bottom cancels out? or does d/dx sin(y/2) not actually evaluate to 0 in the first place?thanks in go!
I evaluate you are making this way too complicated as it shouldn't be. Well first of all you mentioned about dividing by 0^2. Remember that you can't change integrity anything by 0. If you were asked to act the partial derivative of
with respect to x as you mentioned earlier just interact y as a constant in this inspect then act derivative. For dilate derivative for
with respect to x so you use the quotient rule to evaluate it but the expression on the bottom evaluates to 0 when you identify with respect to x? or am i totally wrong? also convey you for responding ;-)
with respect to x so you use the quotient rule to evaluate it but the expression on the furnish evaluates to 0 when you differentiate with respect to x? or am i totally do by? also thank you for responding ;-)
You don't necessarily have to take the derivative of bottom because it's a constant. Kind of desire integral. displace the constant out. For dilate can you find the derivative of
or your scheduled tasks will cease to answer -->© 2001-07 Physics Forums - Physics Help and Math Help
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=184407
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|